Jerry forgot to plug in his laptop before he went to bed. He wants to take the laptop to his friend's house with a full battery. The pictures below show screenshots of the battery charge indicator after he plugs in the computer.
The battery seems to be charging at a rate of 1 percentage point per minute. So the battery should be fully charged at 10:11 AM.Explain Jerry's calculation. Is his estimate most likely an under- or over-estimate? How does it compare to your prediction?
The laptop started charging at 9:11 a.m. and it was initially 41% charged. If we let \(t\) be time since the laptop was plugged in, this information corresponds to the point with coordinates \((0,41).\) Similarly, we can translate the other screenshots into coordinate points: \((16, 56),\ (25, 64),\ (37, 74),\ (44, 79),\ (57, 86),\ (66, 91)\).
We can now make a scatter plot of the data to get an idea how the two variables are related.
It looks like there is a linear relationship between the variables.
Using technology such as a graphing calculator or WolframAlpha we find that \(b=43.7+0.757t.\)
We can extend the line of best fit and see at what time it will reach an output value of 100%. This happens about 75 minutes after the computer was plugged in.
We can also use the equation to solve \(b=43.7+0.757t=100\) for \(t\) to obtain \(t\approx 74.5\) minutes.
Jerry's estimate will probably be an underestimate for the time needed to fully charge the battery. He is overestimating the rate at which the battery is charging. Therefore, his calculation comes up with a shorter amount of time than is actually needed.
We can visualize Jerry's method with a line of slope 1 through the point \((16,56)\).
We can use the line of best fit to find an estimate for the time it would take for the battery to charge from 0 to 100%. If we extend the line to the left, we see that it crosses the horizontal axis at about \(-60\). So we can estimate that it would have taken 60 minutes for the battery to go from 0% to 41% and we already estimated that it would take about 75 minutes to go from 41% to 100%. So it would take about 135 minutes to charge the battery all the way from 0 to 100%.
This is probably not a bad estimate. Our average rate of change calculations show that we are probably underestimating the time it takes to charge the last 20 percentage points. But on the other hand, we probably overestimated the time it takes for the battery to go from 0 to 40%, so we should be close overall.
Commentary
This task uses a situation that is familiar to students to solve a problem they probably have all encountered before: How long will it take until an electronic device has a fully charged battery? A linear model can be used to solve this problem.
The task combines ideas from statistics, functions and modeling. It is a nice combination of ideas in different domains in the high school curriculum. Focus in high school means finding connections between the different topics that are covered. Lines of best fit are a perfect example of this idea since you are using linear functions to analyze data.
Students are not told how to come up with a model for the situation. Part of their job is to turn the screenshots into data that can be visualized with a scatter plot and analyzed with a linear function. A more scaffolded version of this task is shown for 8th grade: 8.SP.2 Laptop Battery Charge.
The task can be used for instruction with group work and whole class discussion. The last two parts of the task lead towards the question if a line is the best model for this situation. Close inspection shows that there seems to be some downward curvature to the data, which may agree with students' experiences when waiting for batteries to charge. On the other hand, while a line might not be the most accurate model, it is the simplest model that gives a result that is perfectly adequate for the situation, which is an important aspect of mathematical modeling.
The task provides good opportunities for students to engage in SMP 2 - Reason Abstractly and Quantitatively as well as SMP 4 - Model with Mathematics.